The SUSE Security Team Blog has a post with an analysis of seunshare, which is used by SELinux to confine untrusted programs. During a review of version 3.10 of the program, the team identified two local Denial-of-Service (DoS) vectors. Since seunshare is supposed to run on SELinux-enabled systems, it is important to understand what kind of privilege escalation can be achieved when vulnerabilities are exploited in a setuid-root binary like this. Many SELinux-enabled systems, such as Fedora and openSUSE, ship with the "targeted" SELinux policy by default. This policy is focused on confining well-known system services, but assigns an unconfined SELinux context to interactive users by default to achieve a balance between security and usability. There is currently no domain transition from the unconfined domain to the more restricted seunshare_t defined in the SELinux policy for seunshare. This means the execution of seunshare continues in the unconfined domain. Thus in the context of atta